Plaintiff Brian Evans, proceeding pro se, is bringing suit against the Department of Homeland Security; United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for alleged misconduct by federal officials within Defendant entities. Evans alleges that immigration officials offered a witness valuable immigration benefits in return for making a false statement regarding Plaintif’s marriage Plaintiff accuses one agent of engaging in the coercive activity. Plaintiff brings forth this action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act after he filed, six months prior to initiating this suit, a Standard Form 95 administrative tort claim regarding the events in controversy. Plaintiff additionally alleges that he was subjected to intentional infliction of emotional distress. He accuses the Defendants of breaching certain duties against him as well.
If interested, please refer to the Court’s website at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/volunteer-opportunities-and-pro-bono-assistance, specifically the information on how to Volunteer to Represent a Client For a Specific Case. Any questions, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov

Defendant seeks an attorney to represent her. The United States has filed an action to revoke Defendant’s naturalized U.S. citizenship. The U.S. alleges that, before Defendant became a naturalized U.S. citizen, she engaged in criminal activity that she concealed throughout the naturalization process and that disqualified her from U.S. citizenship. The U.S. seeks to denaturalize Defendant on three grounds:

(1) she illegally procured her U.S. citizenship because she committed an unlawful act during the statutory period before she naturalized that precluded her from demonstrating the requisite good moral character;
(2) she illegally procured her U.S. citizenship because she provided false testimony at her naturalization interview, which also precluded her from demonstrating the requisite good moral character; and
(3) she concealed and willfully misrepresented her unlawful acts, which adversely reflect on her moral character, throughout the naturalization proceedings. The case is at a very early stage. Representation would entail representing Defendant during all pretrial proceedings, including discovery and dispositive motions, and during trial, if necessary.

If interested, please refer to the Court’s website at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/volunteer-opportunities-and-pro-bono-assistance, specifically the information on how to Volunteer to Represent a Client For a Specific Case. Any questions, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov

Plaintiff, Alexis Valdes, seeks a volunteer lawyer to represent him in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a law enforcement officer and the City of Margate. Plaintiff alleges three claims: Excessive Force and False Arrest against the Officer and a Monell claim for unconstitutional policy, custom, and failure to train against the City of Margate. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that while responding to a car accident, the Officer encountered Plaintiff, saw that Plaintiff was “backing away” from the Officer “as if in a fighting stance,” and escalated the encounter from there, causing the Officer and Plaintiff to grapple on the ground until the Officer struck him three times in the face. Afterwards, Plaintiff was charged with resisting arrest. The Officer’s body worn camera was shut off for the one-minute span when the Officer struck Plaintiff in the face. The Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss but the Motion is only directed at the Monell claim against the City of Margate, so the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s claims against the Officer are not challenged at this stage. This case is at an early stage, and representation would entail representing Plaintiff during all pretrial proceedings, including discovery, at a potential settlement conference, and at trial, if necessary.

If interested, please refer to the Court’s website at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/volunteer-opportunities-and-pro-bono-assistance, specifically the information on how to Volunteer to Represent a Client For a Specific Case. Any questions, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov

Pro se Plaintiff, Katty Monlouis, is seeking representation in her discrimination action against her previous employer. Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint asserts nine claims: racial discrimination in violation of Title VII (Count I); hostile work environment in violation of Title VII (Count II); retaliation in violation of Title VII (Count III); wage violations in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (Count IV); wrongful termination / retaliatory discharge (Count V); interference with rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (Count VI); Family and Medical Leave Act retaliation (Count VII); disability discrimination and failure to accommodate under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Count VIII); and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Count IX). The case is in its early stages, with discovery opening on May 27, 2026, and set to close on January 4, 2027. Trial is set for May 3, 2027. Plaintiff’s deposition is set for September 21, 2026. Volunteer representation would entail representing Plaintiff during all pretrial proceedings and, if necessary, at trial. Alternatively, limited-scope representation would be appreciated. Plaintiff speaks English as a second language; therefore, familiarity and proficiency with French is encouraged.

If interested, please refer to the Court’s website at https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/volunteer-opportunities-and-pro-bono-assistance, specifically the information on how to Volunteer to Represent a Client For a Specific Case. Any questions, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov