Available Cases – Volunteer Opportunities and Pro Bono Assistance

Pursuant to recently adopted Administrative Order 2014-14, the Court is revamping its process for obtaining pro bono counsel for pro se litigants. Please check back in the near future for further information. In the meantime, inquiries should be directed to FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Available Cases:

Denture Cream Products Liability Litigation (09-MD-02051-CMA)

Pro se Plaintiff Patricio Mamot sues GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical Co. et al. to recover damages in a personal injury products liability multi-district litigation involving other plaintiffs. Plaintiffs alleged Defendants’ negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the product, denture adhesive creams, were the direct and proximate causes of damages suffered by the plaintiffs. The Court granted summary judgment for the Defendants and entered final judgment as to nearly all plaintiffs, but Mamot and one other plaintiff were allowed an extension to present expert evidence to oppose the summary judgment motion. Plaintiff now seeks counsel to assist in opposing this summary judgment motion.

If interested, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Krause v. Baer’s Furniture Co. Inc. (16-CV-62283-WPD)

Docket Sheet

Pro se Plaintiff seeks monetary relief against Defendants regarding her alleged wrongful termination of employment. Plaintiff brings the claim under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and/or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.  If interested, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Teigen v. Miami Veterans Health Care Systems (16-CV-23139-RNS)

Michael Robert Teigen sues Miami Veterans Health Care Systems and its director, Paul Russo, under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for confiscating his $1000.00 tax refund and collecting monies which were not owed. If interested, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Grantley v. Jones et al. (15-22724-CV-JAL) Updated 9/26/2016

Docket Sheet

Updated on 9/26/16

Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner at the Florida State Prison in Raiford, Florida, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, against corrections officers and nurses at the Miami-Dade Pretrial Detention Center. He alleges that he was beaten twice by several corrections officers, that other officers failed to intervene, and that he was denied medical attention for his injuries. The Defendants’ motion to dismiss has been denied and they have filed answers. The Plaintiff claims that he needs the assistance of an attorney because due to conditions including severe vision loss and the prohibition from corresponding with inmate witnesses. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Krause v. Brewster (16-CV-62284-BB)
Plaintiff, a 52 year old Caucasian female who suffers from a heart condition, has filed a suit for discrimination pursuant to Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and/or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act for her alleged wrongful termination. If interested, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.
Collins v. City of Miami et al. (16-CV-22109-CMA)

Plaintiff filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against a City of Miami police officer (“Defendant”) for use of excessive force and unlawful arrest.  Plaintiff alleges he was at a Publix supermarket purchasing pasta when Defendant verbally attacked and acted malicious towards Plaintiff.  After purchasing the pasta, Plaintiff claims he sat in Publix’s foyer to eat.  Then, Defendant told Plaintiff, in a bullying manner, he could not sit in the foyer.  Thereafter, Plaintiff exited Publix but returned afterwards to buy a beverage. Upon his return to Publix, Plaintiff alleges Defendant arrested him for trespass and took him to a back room where Defendant threw Plaintiff to the floor, pointed a weapon to his head, and turned off the lights.

The case is presently pending after filing of the answer and affirmative defenses by defendant.  If interested, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Cendan v. Trujillo et al (16-CV-21775-KMW)

The plaintiff is suing six police officers for excessive use of force during  his arrest, the remaining 28 defendants have been dismissed in the screening report and recommendation and the order adopting same. The plaintiff alleges that after leading the police on a vehicle chase, he was severely beaten after he was handcuffed and in the control of the police. He alleges that he was surrounded by police cars. Multiple officers had him held at gunpoint. He contends that he complied with their orders but was nevertheless pulled from his vehicle and beaten to unconsciousness He claims he was hospitalized as a result of the beating.

The case is in the preliminary stages and service of process is just being ordered.

If interested, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Touzout v. America Best Car Rental KF Corp. et al (15-cv-61767-WM)

Docket sheet

Plaintiff sues his former employer for overtime wages, retaliation, back wages, religious discrimination, religious harassment, discrimination based on national origin, and harassment based on national origin, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., § 1981, and the Florida Civil Rights Act, § 760.10, Fla. Stat., et seq. Plaintiff seeks pro bono counsel due to his prior attorney’s withdrawal. The case is stayed and discovery is closed. As of the date of this posting, Plaintiff has a Motion in Limine pending. Plaintiff has requested a Jury Trial, and the trial will be held before United States Magistrate Judge William Matthewman in West Palm Beach, Florida. The trial date is not currently set and may be scheduled for a date certain when convenient to counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant. If interested, please contact: Matthewman@flsd.uscourts.gov

Mitchell v. Thorpe et al (15-CV-61807-KAM)

This case concerns the unlawful use of force by an officer against a pretrial detainee and the failure of the Sheriff, who witnessed the beating, to intervene, together with a claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need following the beating. The case has been screened, service accomplished, and answer(s) filed, and it is currently in discovery. If interested, please email FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Hightower v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al (15-CV-61229-BB)

Plaintiff filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the constitutionality of his convictions for armed burglary with a firearm, two counts of armed robbery with a firearm, and felon in possession of a firearm, entered following a jury verdict in Broward County Circuit Court.  In his petition, the Plaintiff makes arguments implicating a number of issues relating to criminal procedure, e.g., search incident to arrest, ineffective assistance of counsel, etc.  After extensive analysis, the Magistrate Court recommended dismissal of the petition, which the District Court adopted only in part, citing a deficiency therein. Regardless, the District Court ultimately dismissed the petition. Plaintiff now seeks counsel on appeal. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Green v. Croft et al (15-cv-14207-JEM)

Plaintiff sues numerous officers, all employed with the Martin County Sheriff’s Department arising from a May 28, 2013 unlawful use of force during an arrest. The case has been screened, and Defendants Croft and Maganiello have been served and have since filed answers. There remain unidentified John Doe officers which Plaintiff claims were involved in the beating. The case is in discovery, and the Plaintiff needs assistance in obtaining the identity of the remaining officers and getting the case ready for trial.  If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Harry v. Collado et al (15-CV-23036-FAM)

This case is currently proceeding against the remaining two named defendants Mathurin and Smythe arising from claims of deliberate indifference, failure to keep safe, pendent state law claim sounding in negligence, and punitive damages. Plaintiff alleges that the named Defendants ignored his repeated requests for medical/mental health treatment while on psychiatric watch, and as a result, he self-inflicted wounds, which also went unattended and ignored by the defendants, resulting in the loss of blood and the eventual transport by helicopter to a local hospital where the plaintiff underwent trauma surgery and had to receive blood transfusions. All defendants have been served, many have been voluntarily dismissed due to settlement with risk management, but two defendants remain in the suit, Defendants Mathurin and Smythe.

If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Gousse v. Chambers (16-CV-20216-RNS)

Reginald Gousse sues Amili Chambers for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on a post Chambers wrote on Facebook. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Worrell v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. et al (16-CV-80870-WJZ)

Docket Sheet

Plaintiff, who is a “reservist with over fifteen years of honorable service in the United States Naval Forces,” filed a complaint seeking damages from an allegedly wrongful foreclosure that substantially took place while he was deployed. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Delva v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (15-CV-23791-AOR)

Docket Sheet

Plaintiff brings this action against the Commissioner of Social Security seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny Plaintiff social security benefits. If interested in taking this case, please contact Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’ chambers at otazo-reyes@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Rotte v. United States of America (14-14036-CIV-MARRA)

Docket Sheet

A pro se litigant seeks an attorney to represent him in the appeal of the district court’s order granting summary judgment against him.  At the district court, the litigant (who represented himself) sued the Internal Revenue Service for allegedly failing to release the notice of a federal tax lien and engaging in wrongful collection activity.  The attorney would be responsible for filing and arguing the appeal in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Ronald Youmans v. Nelson Ojeda, et al. (15-CV-14164-KAM)

The case has been screened and is proceeding on claims of unlawful use of force; deliberate indifference to a serious medical need or condition; and punitive damage claims against the named Defendants, Miller, Ojeda, Paquette, and Laurson, in their individual capacity, following his arrest, and request for medical attention.  Plaintiff alleges the named defendants rushed into his cell, threw him on the floor, and began kicking and beating him, stepping on and breaking one of his arms. He also alleges he was denied medical treatment for 25 days following the beating because he was placed in confinement, and when finally treated, he was told he would require surgery to re-break the arm. All defendants have been served and have filed answers, with the exception of Laurson, who may be in default since telephonic inquiry reveals he was served March 29th, but no return has been filed to date. The case is currently in the discovery phase.

If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Lotacki v. Molina, (15-61896-CV-WJZ) Guardian ad Litem

Plaintiff, a citizen of Poland and resident of Spain, brought a claim under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act and the Hague convention, seeking to have his minor child returned to him at the child’s habitual residence in Spain.  Plaintiff claims that the child’s mother, a citizen of Cuba, wrongfully removed the child from Spain to the United States without plaintiff’s permission.  Defendant currently resides in the Southern District of Florida with the minor child.

The Court has entered a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendant from leaving the Southern District of Florida while the case is pending.  The Court seeks an attorney to represent the minor child as guardian ad litem for this case, including, if need be, at trial on the merits before the District Court to determine whether the child must be returned to Spain pursuant to the International Child Abduction Remedies Act and the Hague Convention.

If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Savoie v. Bradshaw et al (13-CV-80517-WJZ)

Both pro se Plaintiffs seek pro bono counsel and are suing various defendants in the Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office and the Jerome Golden Center for violations of their constitutional rights, pursuant to §1983. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Mims v. Cesaire (15-CV-24571-JAL)

Docket Sheet

Plaintiff, a prisoner in federal custody, filed a Section 1983 complaint alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment.  Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant, a registered nurse working at the prison facility, refused to provide him with his seizure medication in retaliation for making a complaint against the Defendant.  Plaintiff has yet to serve the Defendant, and no response has been made in this case.  If interested, please contact: Jeffrey_Thomas@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Ledea v. Metro-Dade County Police Department et al (13-CV-23117-UU)

The plaintiff is suing police officers alleging excessive use of force during his arrest on two separate occasions. He claims that the two instances are somehow linked because he has been allegedly had difficulties with Miami police and Miami-Dade police. In December 2009 he was arrested during a prostitution sting and alleges that the officers beat him. In November 2010 he was arrested for possession of cocaine, aggravated fleeing and resisting arrest. The defendants in the November 2010 incident filed a motion to dismiss which it has been recommended be denied.  The defendants in the 2009 incident have not been served although service is now outstanding since they have been properly identified as City of Miami officers.  If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Coleman v. Florida Department of Children & Families et al (14-CV-61019-WJZ)

Plaintiff has brought suit against the three named defendants claiming his constitutional rights were violated due to his involuntary civil commitment for eleven months predicated on a false and defective psychological report. The final amended complaint has been screened, and discovery is ongoing.  If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Dewitt v. Pena (15-CV-21094-MGC)

The Plaintiff, who is incarcerated at the Columbia Correctional Institution in Lake City, Florida, filed a Section 1983 complaint alleging that a Miami-Dade police officer used excessive force during his arrest by slamming his face on the back of a patrol car while he was handcuffed. He claims that he is disabled under the Americans with Disabilities and suffered severe abrasions to his face, eyes, and head, swelling on the right side of his brain, severe head trauma, neck pain, blurred vision and severe chronic headaches. He seeks damages for mental and physical pain, past medical costs, and future medical costs. The complaint passed initial screening and the Defendant has filed an answer. Discovery closes on February 22, 2106, and dispositive motions are due on March 28, 2016.  If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Levine v. Hernandez (15-CV-21220-JAL)

The Plaintiff, who is incarcerated at the South Florida Reception Center, filed a Section 1983 complaint alleging deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. He claims that he was diagnosed with osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia prior to his incarceration and was treated with prescription medication. The Florida Department of Corrections substituted non-prescription medication when he entered custody in March, 2010, and discontinued all pain medication without cause in April 2014. He claims that the discontinuation of medication has resulted in pain and a pronounced limp. He seeks compensatory and punitive damages, declaratory judgment, and the immediate issuance of appropriate pain medication. The amended complaint has passed initial screening and the three defendants remaining in the case filed answers. A motion to dismiss was filed on November 12, 2015, and remains pending. Discovery closes on April 8, 2016, and motions to dismiss and for summary judgment are due on May 13, 2016. The pro se Plaintiff claims that he requires the assistance of counsel because he lacks the expertise to litigate the case, and because he is being denied legal mail while he is on disciplinary confinement for three months.

If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Ogris v. Broward County, et al. (15-CV-61395-JIC)

Docket Sheet

The Plaintiff, who is incarcerated at the Broward County Main Jail, seeks assistance in filing a facially sufficient Section 1983 complaint. He appears to allege the use of excessive force against a mentally ill person during arrest, deliberate indifference, and/or unconstitutional conditions of confinement. The amended complaint and financial records supporting his motion to proceed in forma pauperis are due on January 5, 2016. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Picardat v. City of Miami et al (15-CV-24305-DPG)

Docket Sheet

Plaintiff brings claims against the City of Miami and various individual police officers, alleging civil rights violations arising from a vehicle stop. The Plaintiff alleges that the stop resulted in unreasonable search and seizure and the use of excessive force. This case is presently in the preliminary stages, awaiting service on the Defendants. If interested, please contact: gayles@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Townson v. Mr. Scarpetti et al (15-CV-14102-RLR)

This 1983 suit involves an Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need claim and punitive damage claim arising from the named Defendant’s failure to honor and abide by his pre-confinement DC6-229 form, medical profile, and low bunk pass, requiring that he be assigned to a low bunk and low tier housing due to his diagnosed, history of severe epileptic seizures. The complaint has been screened under the PLRA, service ordered, and defendants have filed answers and/or motions to quash.

The Court is seeking an attorney to enter a Special Appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff for the sole purpose of assisting the plaintiff in completing the pretrial discovery process and responding to summary judgment motions in accordance with Special Appearance Local Rule 4(c). Upon completion of discovery, the attorney can either continue with the case or refer it back for further attention. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Williams v. Santiago et al (15-CV-60818-WPD)

In this Section 1983 civil rights case, the incarcerated pro se plaintiff alleges that the named defendants needlessly punched his eye and kicked him to the ground during his arrest. He claims that the use of excessive force injured his sinus cavity which required surgery and has caused migraine headaches, flashbacks, and numbness. The case has passed preliminary screening and is pending against ten police officers. Discovery is underway and one motion to dismiss is pending. The pro se plaintiff claims that he is having difficulty obtaining the records he requires in discovery.

The Court is seeking an attorney to represent the plaintiff for the sole purpose of assisting the plaintiff in completing the pretrial discovery process and responding to summary judgment motions in accordance with Special Appearance Local Rule 4(c). Upon completion of discovery, the attorney can either continue with the case or refer it back for further attention. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Malik v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al (14-CV-23204-JLK)

In this 1983 case, the incarcerated pro se plaintiff alleges that the named defendants have been deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, providing no treatment for his neuropathy, and claiming it has been over a year since he has had a follow-up exam regarding his HDL-C, causing his hypertension to go unmanaged and become life threatening. He further claims there is a policy in place at the state operated, but privately managed medical facility at Everglades CI, of providing cursory or minimal medical care management, and ignoring or failing to adequately treat medical conditions, as a cost saving measure. The case is proceeding on claims of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and that the punitive damages claim also proceed. All defendants, with the exception of Louissant have been served and have filed answers. As to Louissant, the Marshal is attempted to serve that defendant with process. The case is in the discovery phase as to all other defendants.

The Court is seeking an attorney to enter a Special Appearance on behalf of the plaintiff for the sole purpose of assisting the plaintiff in completing the pretrial discovery process and responding to summary judgment motions in accordance with Special Appearance Local Rule 4(c).  Upon completion of discovery, the attorney can either continue with the case or refer it back for further attention. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Green v. Heller et al (15-80404-CV-DMM)

The plaintiff, Dale Toby Green, while confined at South Bay Correctional Facility, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C., Section 1983.  The case is proceeding as to defendants Dr. Jules Heller, Medical Director at South Bay Correctional Facility, and Nurse John Wade, on plaintiff’s claim of denial of adequate medical care.  Plaintiff claims the foregoing defendants have been deliberately indifferent to his medical conditions by failing to provide him proper medical care and treatment.  Specifically, plaintiff asserts defendants Heller and Wade have ignored repeated recommendations to treat his tightening skin resulting from burns to over 80% of his body that he sustained as a child.

The Court is seeking an attorney to enter a Special Appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff for the sole purpose of assisting the plaintiff in completing the pretrial discovery process and responding to summary judgment motions in accordance with Special Appearance Local Rule 4(c). Upon completion of discovery, the attorney can either continue with the case or refer it back for further attention.  If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Tuer v. Broward County Jail et al (13-CV-62732-DPG)

Plaintiff alleges Defendants Dr. Errol Campbell and Nurse Johnson were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs.  After an initial screening, the Court has permitted this claim to proceed.  Defendant Campbell was served on October 1, 2015. If interested, please contact: Gayles@flsd.uscourts.gov

Ruiz v. Wing et al (15-22618-CV-UU)

The Plaintiff sues various officers arising out of their unlawful use of force during Plaintiff’s 2014 arrest. The Complaint has been screened, however, Plaintiff has sought the request of a volunteer lawyer to assist in perfecting an amended complaint and conducting discovery. The case is presently in the preliminary stages, with service being perfected since Plaintiff has been granted pauper status. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Pierre v. Israel, et al. (15-61812-CV-WPD)

Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, has filed this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C., Section 1983, against correctional and medical personnel employed by the Broward County Main Jail, arising from claims of unlawful use of force, failure to intervene, and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need  stemming from a July 14, 2015,  incident.  The case has been screened and service has been ordered. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Kozich v. Deibert (15-61386-CV-WPD)

Docket Sheet

Pro se Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendants regarding his tenancy and the non-renewal of his apartment lease, which is subject to the Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing program of the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs and the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Perez v. Trust Security Services, Inc. et (15-CV-21203-JLK)

Docket Sheet

The Court is seeking an attorney to assist Defendant, proceeding pro se, in defending against claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act to recover unpaid overtime compensation.  If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Grimaldo v. Carnival Corporation et al (14-CV-22882-CMA)

Docket Sheet

Plaintiff asserts various negligence claims against Carnival Corporation and individual medical Defendants.  Plaintiff was a passenger on a Carnival vessel in 2013.  As alleged in the complaint, Plaintiff was presented to the medical facility onboard the vessel with complaints of dizziness, headaches, shortness of breath, etc., and was misdiagnosed by the medical defendants and told it was safe to fly on an airplane.  As a result, Plaintiff suffered a stroke and now suffers from permanent brain injury.  The complaint was drafted and filed by Plaintiff’s former counsel.  Defendant Carnival has answered the complaint.  The individual medical Defendants, all foreign citizens, have waived service but contest personal jurisdiction.  Plaintiff needs an attorney to represent her, conduct jurisdictional discovery, and pursue her claims.  The case is administratively closed so Plaintiff can obtain counsel.  The case will be reopened upon Plaintiff’s counsel filing a notice of appearance and motion to reopen.  If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Goldstein Law Group, P.A. v. Machado et al (15-cv-61145-Cooke)

Plaintiff, a law firm, filed suit against pro se Defendants, its former employees, seeking declaratory and equitable relief, equitable and compensatory damages, and attorney’s fees and costs, for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Stored Communications Act, and Florida common law. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants participated in a scheme designed to breach the law firm’s computer and communications systems. The Court is seeking an attorney to assist two of the three Defendants implicated in this scheme with discovery, motion practice, and trial. The two Defendants have indicated that they would particularly appreciate the assistance of an attorney at an early court-mandated mediation or settlement conference.
If interested, please contact: FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov

Johnson v. Captain (15-CV-21232-UU)

Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, who claims to be wheelchair bound, brings a claim of unlawful use of force and injuries resulting therefrom against a captain at a prison mental health facility in February 2015.  The case has been screened and an order entered permitting the case proceed against the officer on plaintiff’s claim of unlawful use of force.  At this time, given the plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, the court’s agents for service of process shall be perfecting service against the defendant.  The Court is seeking an attorney to enter a Special Appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff for the sole purpose of assisting the plaintiff in completing the pretrial discovery process and responding to summary judgment motions, in accordance with Special Appearance Local Rule 4(c).  Upon completion of discovery, the attorney can either continue with the case or refer it back for further attention.  If interested, please contact FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov.

Charles v. Broward County Main Jail (14-CV-62816-WPD)

Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, alleges an excessive force claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff states that on December 22, 2013, he was beaten in the face several times and kicked in the stomach in a booking room by an unknown deputy. He states that he was bleeding from the mouth and head. If interested, please contact FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov

Henderson v. Crews, et al (13-14236-CIV-Martinez)

Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, has filed a civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 suing numerous employees at Martin Correctional, claiming he was denied Celexia, a medication for his schizophrenia. As a result, he began hearing voices and attempted to hang himself in his cell. He told staff at Martin that he needed his medications, but he claims they thought he was “faking it.” At the time of filing the complaint, he still had been denied the medication and, in fact, claims to have been released without any medical treatment having been provided. The Court is seeking an attorney to enter a Special Appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff for the sole purpose of assisting the plaintiff in completing the pretrial discovery process and responding to summary judgment motions in accordance with Special Appearance Local Rule 4(c). Upon completion of discovery, the attorney can either continue with the case or refer it back for further attention. If interested, please contact FLSD_ProBono@flsd.uscourts.gov

Cummings v. Blank (former) et al (13-CV-22042-Scola)

Docket Sheet

Plaintiff brings this action against her employer claiming age and gender discrimination based on failure to promote and denial of training. If interested in taking this case, please contact Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’ chambers at otazo-reyes@flsd.uscourts.gov